According to • North Fork Patch:
>> Satur Farms received approval for a new site plan in September of 2009
The story of the site plan application is misrepresented by reporting the approval, and failing to report the litigation and other preliminary actions.
And, according to the North Fork Patch:
>> Lademann's sign is out of compliance with the town code.
The legality of the protest signs has not been determined by proper process, for Town officials to alledge that a sign is illegal without evidence of any prosecution let alone conviction is wrong.
• Years of Complaints Prompt Town to Scrutinize Satur
According to • Suffolk Times:
Supervisor Scott Russell said “This is a slippery slope. Under the umbrella of agriculture, a lot is allowed.”
What does that mean? The excuse that the Town has no authority over agriculture is a blatant lie promulgated to appease the farm lobby.
It was also reported that: The Planning Board was satisfied that enough planting of crops was taking place to consider the shipment of vegetables an ancillary use.
So what does that mean, are there no regulations on ancillary uses?
• Concerns arise over Satur Farms’ trucks
Suffolk Times 7/7/11
>> "I don't know. But my husband is an honest man. He has more integrity than anyone I know. That's why he isn't in the restaurant business anymore." Paulette Satur, wife of former chef Eberhard Muller, now co-owners of Satur Farms newyork.grubstreet.com/2009/11/charges_against_satur_farms_mu.html
>> Celeb chef called a 'Nazi scumbag' by neighbors who say his farm is 'killing us with fumes': suit
www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2011/09/04... |